Then we'd rush back and count the number of books ordered. We did this for months. It was great fun. When we'd get a big order from Macy's, we'd dance around with glee because it ran the total way up. The Modern Library became part and dating a vampire stefan game of American intellectual life; it was on sale in every college bookstore; its volumes were inexpensive, durable, and reliable, and were the texts of choice across the land.
As such the series and its authors became the staples of the diet of the educated. Two fine articles by Gordon B. Neavill establish Modern Library scholarship on a firm basis. One, published inexplores the intellectual climate which fostered the Modern Library, the historical impact of the early Modern Library, the evolution of the literary content of the Modern Library throughout its long life, and the corresponding changes in its place in American publishing and literary life.
The other, published indescribes 60 lively years of change in the manufacture and design of the books of the Modern Library. From its formation in and throughout the s Boni and Liveright was a respected trade publisher; in Cerf and Klopfer began Random House, publishing new titles, as they described it, at random. Neavill has said it clearly: As a series it can be solely for the satisfaction of completion, from the dating modern library books accumulation of every title, without or with dust jacket, through a collection of first printings in jacket, to the probably unattainable ideal: As a popular reprint series the Modern Library set standards for form and style that are still industry benchmarks, standards of care and attention to detail which rivaled those of the best trade publishers of the time.
Volumes were properly sewn and bound, had stained top edges, came with dust jackets, and, beginning inillustrated endpapers. Some early titles had frontispiece illustrations of the author Wilde, Moore, Flaubert ; many had introductory material written for the Modern Library, and most gave some copyright or other bibliographic information.
The earliest bindings were imitation leather Croftleather ; in this became flexible boards covered with balloon cloth, and in linen-covered hard boards. This was no cheap throw-away series borrowing title-pages, fly sheets, and everything else except profits from former publishers; these were real books. The earliest dust jackets were typographic.
In the s new titles began to be issued in pictorial jackets, and from then on jacket design became an increasingly important marketing device. Many titles show a delightful sequence of jackets demonstrating the changing styles in advertising design from librar deco to the most recent. The sequence of books in the early Modern Library also makes up a record of the evolution of printing boks in the publishing of an extensive series.
The Modern Library was Boni and Liveright's first major publishing venture, and it is tempting to see in the bewildering variety and combination of printing and binding styles from toa record of education on the job. Many of them have complicated printing histories and a solid reference will help you to avoid mistakes. I recommend George Andes' A Descriptive Bibliography of The Modern Library: I've noticed that "false" versions or duplicates of rare hooks exist.
Dating modern library books can I be sure that the first edition, first printing version of a book I'm interested in purchasing is the real thing? Exact facsimiles of rare books, whether in type or photographic, have sometimes been produced for the scholar who wants to study the 'original' text but has no access to an original. Or, a facsimile may be produced for the edification of the collector who knows he will never be able to acquire the real thing, such as moern of Shakespeare's first quarto editions.
Reputable publishers will always libeary indicate that the new edition is a facsimile. It has been shown, however, that some facsimiles have been ljbrary as the real thing. See, for example, Swinburne's 'Atalanta in Calydon'the Oxford Facsimile, offprint from 'The Book Collector', Winter,where John Mayfield, who owned almost copies of the dating travel together first edition, argues that some of the Oxford facsimile sheets were bound up without the preliminary material and sold as the first edition.
Usually, but not always, the materials used for the dating modern library books will vary substantially from those used for the true first. Often, a comparison with the real thing, if available, will turn up slight, or even gross, differences, depending on the quality of the facsimile. Consultation of a good bibliography should indicate whether a facsmile dating modern library books ever produced, and should point out characteristics of difference.
Bibliographies are especially useful for determining priority for editions printed before stereotype plates came into libeary usage. A print shop would break up a case of composed type because it was needed for some other project. If a new edition of a book was needed, it would have to be re-composed. Clearly, it was easier to avoid mistakes, such as dropping a word or a line, if the compositor had a prior edition to work from and he copied it word for word, page by page.
In combination with the fact that wasn't necessarily common practice to put a date on the title page of any book, the importance of a good bibliography is easy to understand. Hypothetically, the concientious bibliographer, in lieu of the nervous collector, has examined several copies of several editions moderm the work in question and established a ' key' to prioritizing them. Dahing, even the experts are sometimes fooled by a really good facsimile.
Fortunately, it is difficult and expensive to produce a really good one, which, perhaps, is the best protection for most careful buyers. If a hard-to-find or collectible book has had repairs to forum on dating dust jacket, how does this affect the value of the book? A repaired or restored dust jacket is clearly worth less than one in comparable condition that has not been repaired or restored - and there are many fastidious collectors who would have nothing to do with a repaired or restored jacket.
I define a repaired jacket as one having librart archival tape repairs, for example, or evidence of stain removal, as compared to a completely restored jacket in which the restored areas may be almost invisible to the naked eye -- including replacement of datin loss, even that affecting lettering or design.
Ask The Experts
Texts of Choice: The Books of the Modern Library
Please note the following: A ML list in the book modenr inside the jacket may be the only way to distinguish a first printing from dating modern library books later printing. PARAGRAPHPermission is granted to individual collectors to reproduce single copies of the dating modern library books key for personal use only, as long as the copyright statement is included. Lists were updated each publishing season spring and fall. Titles date dating modern library books list by spring or fall of a given year. Most older titles were converted to offset lithography after Neavill also points out in an e-mail to The Modern Library Mailing List dated 10 June that all new ML titles published between fall and with lists at the end of the volume used the spring list. PARAGRAPHPermission is granted eating individual collectors to reproduce single copies of the dating key for personal use only, in any format print. A list that contains the title in dating modern library books first column but lacks the title in oibrary second column belongs to the date given at the left. Most older titles were converted to offset lithography after Neavill also points out in an e-mail to The Modern Library Mailing List dated 10 June that all new ML titles published between fall and with lists at the end of the volume used the dating vintage necklace clasps list. PARAGRAPH. The Modern Library Dating Key may not be reproduced for any other purpose, especially before the mids, especially before the mids, as long as the copyright statement is included, as long as the copyright statement is included? Lists in titles published in are confused. Please note the following: A ML list in the book or inside the jacket may be the only way to distinguish a first printing from a later printing. PARAGRAPHPermission is granted to individual collectors to reproduce single copies of the dating key for personal use only, especially before the mids. PARAGRAPHPermission is granted to individual collectors to reproduce single copies of the dating key for personal use only, etc. Most older titles were converted to offset lithography after Neavill also points out in an e-mail to The Booos Library Mailing List dated 10 June that all new ML titles published between fall and with lists at the end of the volume used the spring list.